Did I say one is better than the other? Nope.. I just said the quality and longevity of Skyrim is superior to KOA.. See this is what happens when you jump to conclusions, should probably take your own advice..
Kingdoms of amalur is a really good game, one of the most fun and best game out atm, so everyone spend more then a few hours playing it and im sure you all will be hooked on it. as for the demo its far from the real game, the real game is much better in every way, Game is best played with a gamepad really like that.
Its gotten allot of bad reviews, 99% of the bad and negative reviews havent even played the game, remember reading one review where one said there is no night and day cycle in the game, when there actually is one, so I was like do these people even play the game, or do they just pretend to. Read the good reviews and give the game a chance, its a pretty awezome game.
This isn't true? Have you done every side quest and achievement etc. Like me and Jerich? It's great for the first 20ish hours. Then it's a drag of repetition. I promise.
That's a different way of saying they have a low polygon count and poor quality textures?
(I don't mean to bash the game or any aspects of it. I just had played the demo when it was released and was underwhelmed by both the gameplay and the presentation, so I was surprised when someone said the graphics are the best they had ever seen in a game. But people like different things and that's fine. I mostly wondered if there had been a newer demo as I recalled that the devs said the original demo was based on several months old code.)
Just so happens that some people in the world appreciate style more than high poly counts and hi-res textures. Sadly most people now a days want high poly models of the brown and bloom variety >_>
The game is abit easy, so anyone who wants to play it set it on hard.